Skip to content

Methodology

Education-Driven Chart Design (EDCD)

EDCD is the proprietary Trinity Insights methodology that enforces strict coherence between the educational content of a chart and its visual rendering. No Trinity chart is published without complete EDCD validation.

Founding principle - the reciprocal contract

A reader who only reads the education should be able to anticipate what the chart will display. A reader who only looks at the chart should be able to anticipate what the education describes.

Any educational promise without a corresponding visual primitive is a violation. Any visual primitive without educational acknowledgement is a violation. The two artefacts form an inseparable contractual pair.

The 7 Trinity education sections

Each Trinity chart exposes an education structured across seven sections, bilingual FR/EN, fully atemporal:

  1. whatIsIt - definition and conceptual formula (without revealing the recipe of Trinity proprietary composites).
  2. howToRead - chart reading guide (axes, scales, legends, zones).
  3. keyZones - significant thresholds and atemporal interpretation ranges.
  4. whatToObserve - elements to monitor (divergences, crossovers, events to watch).
  5. historicalContext - dated factual historical events (halvings, crises, regulatory milestones, etc.).
  6. expertNotes - advanced nuances for experienced users.
  7. commonMisinterpretations - common pitfalls to avoid.

Mandatory visual primitives

Every educational promise maps to a measurable visual primitive:

Education sectionVisual primitive
whatIsItFormula rendered literally (N curves = N declared series).
howToReadAxes, legends, and scales described - all actually rendered.
keyZonesThreshold lines or shaded zones with sufficient contrast for legibility.
whatToObserveMarkers or annotations on the events cited.
historicalContextThe chart history covers the earliest dates referenced.

Multi-pass institutional validation

Each Trinity chart goes through several orthogonal validation passes before publication:

  1. Visual contract : drafting of the primitive ↔ educational source table before any development.
  2. Automated audits : checks for catalog coherence, editorial leakage, regulatory compliance, and analytical parameters.
  3. Deterministic visual review : checklist of observable elements (secondary axes, scales, threshold zones, overlay quality).
  4. High-definition multi-theme captures : rendering of the chart across all supported themes and timeframes.
  5. Institutional quality review : demanding evaluation of the renderings against the EDCD scorecard.
  6. Live interactive validation : testing of toggles, accordions, tooltips, and tabs on the pre-production environment.

Zero tolerance